1.1. Is the story a hero's journey? Try to describe it as a hero's journey and see if it fits the template.
This story is a hero’s journey.
DEPARTURE
• Marcus Aurelius asks Maximus to give Rome back to the people.
• Maximus refuses - he wishes to return home to his wife and child.
• Maximus asks advice from Cicero; he treasures the statuette (magical gift) during this stage of the journey.
INITIATION
• Proximo forces Maximus to learn the art of the gladiator until he transforms to the leader and best of the best.
• Proximo lures Maximus to Rome, where he will have a chance to confront Commodus.
• Lucilla tempts Maximus to meet with Senator Graccus; Cicero and many of Maximus' gladiator allies die.
• Maximus has an opportunity to fight Commodus in the arena.
RETURN
• In the final battle, Maximus gets his revenge by killing Commodus.
• Maximus stands, unsteady, as the vision of the wheat field once again comes to him, his wife and son waiting for him.
2. What did you learn about Rome from this movie? Do some research on the characters. Are they real people from history? Is the film accurate in historical detail? And architectural detail (for example, the Colosseum/ Flavian Ampitheatre)?
The film is loosely based on historical events. Some deviations from historical fact were made.
• • Marcus Aurelius died of plague at Vindobona, and was not murdered by his son Commodus.
• • Commodus is accurately represented as being a tyrant lacking the love and respect of the people.
• • Commodus was strangled by the wrestler Narcissus in his bath, not killed in the arena.
• • Commodus reigned for several years, unlike the brief period shown in the film.
• • Maximus, the real hero of the film, in reality is a fictitious character.
The designs of amphitheatres at Capua, Verona and Pompeii were similar to those of Rome. The Colosseum was over 160 feet high with eighty entrances. The Colosseum was covered with an enormous awning known as the velarium. It was attached to large poles on top of the Colosseum and anchored to the ground by large ropes. About two hundred yards from the amphitheatre stood a smaller temple which served for the ordinary rites and sacrifices.
3. What was happening to the Roman empire during the period of Commodus' rule? And what eventually caused the decline and downfall of the Roman Empire?
Commodus was liked well by the lower class people and the soldiers for most of his reign but was loathed by the senate due to overtaxing. He gave the outward appearance of a generous and stable reign but soon power corrupted him and he committed many perverted acts and ensued on a reign of terror. Commodus believed that his reign had ushered in a golden age for Rome and did a number of things to show off his so called greatness. Commodus was the last Antoinne emperor and, after him, the Roman Empire began its long decline.
The Major Causes for the Downfall of Roman Empire
•Decline in MoralsEmperors like Caligula and Nero waste money on lavish parties where guests drank and ate until they became sick.
• Political Corruption The Romans never created an effective system to determine how new emperors would be selected. The choice was always open to debate between the old emperor, the Senate, the Praetorian Guard (the emperor's private army), and the army. Gradually, the Praetorian Guard gained complete authority to choose the new emperor, who rewarded the guard who then became more influential, perpetuating the cycle.
•Public HealthMany of the wealthy had water brought to their homes through lead pipes. The wealthy death rate was very high.
4. Is this film propaganda for a certain set of ideas or a way of life? Did the writer, director and actors intend for you to have the reactions that you have expressed here? Aren't you just a bit suspicious and critical of the film and the black and white division between Commodus and Maximus? Such a bad and nasty Emperor and such a loyal gladiator! One is a 'good Roman' and the other is just out for himself? Doesn't it all seem a little too simple? So, again, is this film propaganda for an idea of loyalty? To answer this, look at which country produced it and when it was produced. How is the film 'constructed' to provide a lesson to the audiences of that country of its origin? Is it really about Rome, or about the country it came from? What was happening in that country in the years just before it was created?
Propaganda is deftly used through subtle innuendo in the characters of Marcus Aurelius (father) and his evil son Commodus, to draw a parallel with George Bush (Snr) (father) and George Bush (Jnr) (son). Because the character roles in Gladiator are so blatant and glaring, it seems plain George Bush (Jnr) (son) will be elected the President of the United States of America. The script-writers of Gladiator already know the corrupt background of the N.W.O. Bush family. George Bush (Jnr) has “already been chosen” as the new President.
In this film, released in the year 2000, Commodus’s sister is called “Lucilla”. (The name of a famous third century Roman Christian martyr). In propaganda terms, the name “Lucilla” has a close psychological
resemblance to ‘Laura,’ the wife of the coming new President of the United States: - George / ‘Commodus’ Bush (Jnr).
This film is about the country it came from —— United States and it is political propaganda.
Fan Jie Yun 1200355
Goh Shir Pei 1200132